Friday, September 23, 2011

Class in Review: 09.19.11 & 09.21.11

Oh Oedipus, I thought I had left your story behind in high school, but nope your story has followed me to college. My English teacher in high school passed over this story because he really didn’t see how any of it was really relevant to what we were learning. We spent about half an hour discussing it and left it at that; I had completely forgotten who Oedipus was, but I didn’t forget the story and the riddle he solved. When I was reading it there was one question I kept asking myself, “Why are we reading this? I don’t see any connection between Oedipus and a superhero.”


Our class discussion brought up two interesting topics:

    • Should we consider God and/or Jesus as a superhero since we have turned Greek Gods into superheroes.

AND

    • Would we try to fight fate or sit still and let fate occur.


I honestly wouldn’t be able to answer the first point objectively because of certain reasons, but I do believe that if a comic book creator were to attempt to market a Jesus superhero it would most likely be a waste of time. We’re a society that was built on a religious foundation (although there are some people out there that would like to doubt that) and this religion runs deep through people’s veins (not everybody’s). For someone to create Jesus into a superhero I can see some people saying that it’s mocking certain religions or saying that they think Jesus is better than other Gods out there because they’d rather have him as a superhero (or something along those lines). I could only see the concept of Jesus the superhero working if it were to teach kids who he was and what he did. I think it’s easier to turn Greek Gods into superheroes because there isn’t as much conflicts surrounding them. We incorporate them in movies, tv shows, and in other elements as well and there were no outcries against them. To me Greek gods are one step above superheroes, and God and Jesus are in a completely different area.


My opinion on fate is also one that is not objective. There are people who believe in it and place a certain amount of trust in it and there are others who think of fate as just coincidences and don’t believe in it. I believe in fate but to a certain extent, the thing I don’t believe in is the situation that occurred in Oedipus, I think we aren’t supposed to know what our fate is. In the case with Oedipus, if it was fate that he were to kill his father and sleep with his mother, he is the one who fell victim to fate, but I wonder what would have happened if his father wasn’t told that Oedipus would do those things. Would they have kept him? What would’ve happened if they kept him? If they kept him than he would know who is mother is, right? Then how would it be possible for him to sleep with her if he knew who she was? It seems that when we know our fate, depending if it’s good or bad, we try to either do everything in our powers to make that prediction occur or we do everything to prevent it. It seems the more people try to prevent “fate” to occur they blindly walk directly into it.


Word Count: 568

Thursday, September 8, 2011

Class in Review 09.12.11 & 09.14.11

On Monday we discussed whether or not we thought that Beowulf could be considered a superhero or a super hero. Throughout the discussion it was apparent that there are so many different definitions of a superhero and we all have our own opinions of what makes a superhero. I believe Beowulf can be considered a superhero by today's standards because he'd fit the criteria of what I believe a superhero is (as stated in my last post). He may not have gotten his powers from a radioactive spider or fell into a toxic vat of goo, but his "powers" (supposedly) came from God, his strength is unlike a regular man's, and the confidence he has is extraordinary.

There was a point brought up in class that Beowulf is too cocky which takes away from him being a superhero because superheroes are supposed to be humble with their powers, I guess that's why most superheroes have a secret identity, right? Their secret identities are supposed to allow them to blend in and show that they're just like everyone else, even though they're not, right? Well, I was re-reading the first part of Beowulf and I realized that there's a small part that shows his humility. It was before he was to face Grendel and he says, 'So I shall bear no blade in the night if he sees fit to fight without weapons. May God in His wisdom grant whom He wills blessing in battle." (Pg. 1579, 611-614) For Beowulf to abandon all his armor and depend on his strengths and abilities, and to also make it a fair battle, shows that he's cocky but to an extent. He's only interested in a fair battle to prove himself and show that he can talk the talk and walk the walk.

Personally I actually started to like where the discussion was going and I was actually interested in it (to my surprise). The more we discussed whether or not Beowulf could be considered a superhero, during his time, the more I was convinced that he was just super human. Maybe it’s because I kind of think about him and Batman on the same level. Both don’t really have “super powers” they’re human beings that have worked to develop themselves to become stronger and superior than average people. It actually reminds me of what body builders and weightlifters do; they train themselves to become stronger and superior than everyone else. They try to take the human body to the extreme and make us watch in awe as they lift ridiculous amounts of weights.

Back to the story as a whole, I honestly had a difficult time reading the story. The names of most of the characters confused me and I could only understand maybe 25% of what was really going on in the story. I think I understood the important parts, but I think it’d be a better idea for me to sparknotes it and re-read the entire thing. I should be honest, if their names weren’t so difficult to pronounce and actually sounded like real names than I swear it would’ve been so much easier for me to read it. I couldn’t keep up with who was who.


Word Count: 539

Thursday, September 1, 2011

Intro + Components of a Superhero

I guess I should introduce myself first before getting down to business. My name is Janelle Takahata, I'm from Honolulu, Hi (lucky, I know), this is my second year here, and I'm currently majoring in business. The question I get asked a lot is, "Why did you leave Hawaii in the first place?" To that there are two reasons:
1. To live there costs a lot of money.
2. I took my teacher's advice to get off the rock and experience something different.
Since I grew up in Hawaii, the way I talk can be very different from the way other people talk. See, back home there's this unofficial/official language of the islands called Pidgin (not named after the type of bird), we even have a dictionary for it. It's difficult to really explain what Pidgin is, it's a combination of words from different languages and cutting long sentences into shorter ones... forget I can't explain what Pidgin is, if you want to hear what it sounds like than just let me know I guess.


Anyhow, on to business:


In class we discussed the traits/components of a superhero and throughout the discussion I couldn't help but keep thinking that there are many of those traits that individuals in today's society have. The only difference being they can't fly, they don't have invisible jets, a secret lair that has dozens of t.v. screens displaying everything that's going on in the city, they don't run around in tights with their goods getting suffocated, etc. To me the big difference between a superhero and a hero is the fact that superheroes have certain traits or physical abilities that as real people we may never have.
Isn't that what makes them super? Let's take Superman for example. I learned about Superman when I was around five or six years old and to be honest, I had no clue what he looked like. All I knew was that he could fly because of that phrase people said, "Look... Up in the sky... It's a bird... It's a plane... It's Superman!" I mean honestly the fact that a guy good fly without using a rocket or anything of the sorts makes him special in my book, and on top of that he fights crime and saves the world on a daily (well maybe not daily) basis, he is super.
In my opinion superheroes are people who make us want to push "normal" human boundaries, to believe the unbelievable, and they use the "gifts" they were given for good rather than selfish reasons.
To me heroes are people we look up to that have certain traits that we wish we had, and sometimes we can have. Example, my cousin told me he wanted to become a firefighter and I asked him why, he said, "Because they save people who need help, they aren't afraid to go into a burning building, and they're strong." The traits that he described are traits that he can obtain over the years, they're not completely out of reach.

I hope this made sense, it was difficult for me to really illustrate my point without feeling like it'd take people 5+ minutes to read. Anyhow, what's your take one a superhero and/or a hero?
Image from: http://ohmyshoot.blogspot.com/2010/11/hello-kitty-superheroes-version.html